Posted on
February 09, 2010 by
ProGrad
Only yesterday, I was on the telephone to a candidate that recently attended the ProGrad assessment day. Sadly, she didn’t make it through the day, and was feeling rather deflated at the prospect on continuing a difficult job hunt.
One of the reasons this candidate did not make it through the assessment day, was due to a lack of preparation on the day. Despite knowing what to expect, and being advised accordingly – this candidate didn’t prepare and therefore struggled to compete with the other delegates present.
Outside of that, when I was running through some assessment day feedback, I asked the question “How are you getting on with other interviews?”
She explained that the process was hard, she had some decent experience yet was finding it hard to even get in front of employers for the face to face interview. A few minutes spent looking at the resume was all that was required. Very quickly, I noticed a few gleaming errors. I will share these errors here as they might help demonstrate some of the common mistakes made from graduates when applying for jobs.
1) The Career Objective
This part of the resume (in this case) was poorly structured and didn’t explain what the actual career objective was. The overall feel was generic and flaky and it lacked relevance for the jobs which the job seeker was applying for.
2) The Work Experience
In this case, the work experience was strong, and great roles had been held and maintained for long periods of time. Under each employment section, came a long list of the duties completed in the position. Which was fine, but there was absolutely no mention of the SKILLS gained in these roles. Those skills would have been transferable to other organisations and other roles, however the duties may not. SKILLS are essential to identify in the work experience. It is not about “data entry”, or “cashier work”. It is about the competencies developed in the role. Competencies such as confidence, communication skills, drive and determination, negotiation skills, structure and logic. These are far more relevant to mention.
Length
The resume was over 3 pages long, with a poor use of space. Information was long, waffly and unlikley to be read. It was too easy to skim over the resume in a matter of seconds, let alone minutes.
Format
The resume was badly formatted. In short, there were spelling errors, grammatical errors and a mixture of different bullet points used in no particular fashion. It was screaming “poor attention to detail”.
And this was the document utilised as the first impression sent out to an organisation. With some basic formatting and a bit of care and attention, it wouldn’t take long to turn this document around.
I have provided some basic guidance to the job seeker and fingers crossed, it starts to have an impact!